Partner Program Strategy
Partnership strategy

Designs a partner program: partner types, recruitment, enablement, co-marketing, and revenue-share models. Use when the user is starting or restructuring a partner, reseller, or channel program.
---
name: partnership-strategy
description: >-
Designs a partner program: partner types, recruitment, enablement,
co-marketing, and revenue-share models. Use when the user is starting or
restructuring a partner, reseller, or channel program. Triggers on:
"partnership strategy", "partner program", "channel partnerships", "build
partnerships", "partner-led growth".
license: MIT
compatibility: Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Goose, Hermes, Windsurf, Zed
metadata:
version: "1.0.0"
author: LeadMagic
category: partnerships
tags: [partnerships, partner-program, channel, co-marketing, alliances]
frameworks:
- "Bob Moore — Ecosystem-Led Growth"
- "Crossbeam — Account mapping"Overview
Partnerships can become a measurable GTM motion when both sides share a customer or prospect context and define a joint value exchange. Results and economics vary by motion; this skill avoids universal pipeline or CAC promises and covers the operating system needed to test the channel.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill partnership-strategy -g -a claude-codenpx degit LeadMagic/gtm-skills/skills/partnerships/partnership-strategy#main ~/.claude/skills/partnership-strategyConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md7.7 KB
Read SKILL.md here
Show the full text163 lines
Partnership Strategy
Overview
Partnerships can become a measurable GTM motion when both sides share a customer or prospect context and define a joint value exchange. Results and economics vary by motion; this skill avoids universal pipeline or CAC promises and covers the operating system needed to test the channel.
Authoritative Foundations
- Bob Moore — Ecosystem-Led Growth — Put partner ecosystem data at the center of account mapping, co-selling, and attribution; share only approved segments.
- Crossbeam — Account mapping — Find overlapping customers and prospects with each partner to decide who to recruit and where to co-sell.
- Jay McBain (Canalys) — Partner ecosystem influence — Map every partner type that influences the buyer (referral, reseller, integration, services) before designing tiers and incentives.
When to Use
- "Build a partner program"
- "Partnership strategy"
- "Channel partner program"
- "Partner-led growth"
Step-by-Step Process
Phase 1: Partner Type Selection
- Integration partners: Your product integrates with theirs. Co-marketing, co-selling. Easiest to start. "Customers who use [Partner] + [You] get [value]."
- Referral partners: Agencies, consultants, freelancers who recommend tools. Pay % of first-year revenue. Low-touch to manage.
- Reseller partners: Sell your product to their customers. White-label or co-branded. Higher touch; model margin and support obligations from actual unit economics.
- Technology partners: Complementary (not competitive) tools. Shared customer base. Joint roadmap, deep integration.
- Strategic alliances: Enterprise partnerships. Exclusive. Long sales cycle to set up, massive payoff.
Phase 2: Partner Recruitment
- Ideal Partner Profile (IPP): Who has your ICP before you do? Agencies, consultants, complementary tools, industry associations.
- Outbound recruitment: "Your clients ask you about [problem] — we solve it. Let's build a referral relationship."
- Inbound recruitment: Partner page on your website, partner application form, promote in your network.
- Customer → Partner: Your power users often become your best partners.
Phase 3: Partner Enablement
- Partner portal: Deal registration, training materials, co-branded assets, pipeline tracking
- Certification: Product certification program. Certified partners get higher commissions and better leads.
- Sales playbook: How to position your product, who to sell to, objection handling, demo script
- Co-marketing: Joint webinars, co-branded case studies, shared booth at events
Phase 4: Partner Economics
- Referral: Set a time-bounded fee from contribution margin, attribution, and local rules.
- Reseller: Model margin against enablement, support, discounting, and channel conflict.
- Agency/Consultant: Monthly retainer + % of influenced revenue
- Strategic: Custom deal, equity possible at early stage
- Key metric: Partner-sourced and partner-influenced pipeline as a percentage of eligible pipeline, reported separately with documented attribution rules.
Phase 5: Partner Management
- Tier system: Silver → Gold → Platinum based on revenue influenced
- QBRs: Quarterly business reviews with top 20% of partners
- Partner success manager: Dedicated person at 30+ active partners
- Kill criteria: Partners who refer 0 deals in 6 months → re-evaluate or remove
Output Format
Partnership strategy document with: partner types and tiers, IPP definition, recruitment plan, enablement program, economics model, and management framework.
Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- All required sections are complete
- Output matches the user's stated need
- Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations
- No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action
- Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual
Common Pitfalls
- Skipping research. Building output without understanding the specific context. Fix: always gather required inputs before producing deliverables.
- Generic output. "Improve your process" without concrete steps. Fix: every recommendation must include a specific action, timeline, and owner.
- Missing framework citations. Advice without named authorities. Fix: ground every recommendation in a cited framework from a recognized authority.
Execution Artifacts
references/framework-notes.md— named frameworks, citation anchors, and operating assumptionstemplates/output-template.md— copy-paste deliverable structure for the userscripts/check-output.py— local checklist validator for required sections This skill includes lightweight artifacts the agent can load on demand: Use the artifacts when the user asks for an implementation-ready deliverable, a repeatable workflow, or a quality check rather than generic advice.
Implementation Depth
Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation.
Diagnostic Questions
- What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led?
- Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed?
- What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none?
- What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow?
- What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure?
Framework Application
Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill:
- Partnership Ecosystem Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Crossbeam Partner-Led Growth: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
- Crossbeam — Ecosystem-Led Growth: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable.
Deliverable Standard
A strong output from this skill includes:
- A crisp diagnosis of the current situation
- A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list
- A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan
- A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators
- Risks and edge cases called out before execution
Adaptation Rules
- For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity.
- For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets.
- For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements.
Related Skills
- partner-programs, co-marketing, integration-partnerships, channel-partnerships, sales-enablement
| 1 | |
| 2 | name partnership-strategy |
| 3 | description >- |
| 4 | Designs a partner program: partner types, recruitment, enablement, |
| 5 | co-marketing, and revenue-share models. Use when the user is starting or |
| 6 | restructuring a partner, reseller, or channel program. Triggers on: |
| 7 | "partnership strategy", "partner program", "channel partnerships", "build |
| 8 | partnerships", "partner-led growth". |
| 9 | license MIT |
| 10 | compatibility Claude Code, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Goose, Hermes, Windsurf, Zed |
| 11 | metadata |
| 12 | version "1.0.0" |
| 13 | author LeadMagic |
| 14 | category partnerships |
| 15 | tags [partnerships, partner-program, channel, co-marketing, alliances] |
| 16 | frameworks |
| 17 | - "Bob Moore — Ecosystem-Led Growth" |
| 18 | - "Crossbeam — Account mapping" |
| 19 | - "Jay McBain (Canalys) — Partner ecosystem influence" |
| 20 | related_skills [partner-programs, co-marketing, integration-partnerships, sales-enablement] |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | # Partnership Strategy |
| 24 | |
| 25 | ## Overview |
| 26 | |
| 27 | Partnerships can become a measurable GTM motion when both sides share a customer |
| 28 | or prospect context and define a joint value exchange. Results and economics vary |
| 29 | by motion; this skill avoids universal pipeline or CAC promises and covers the |
| 30 | operating system needed to test the channel. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ## Authoritative Foundations |
| 33 | **Bob Moore — Ecosystem-Led Growth** — Put partner ecosystem data at the center of account mapping, co-selling, and attribution; share only approved segments. |
| 34 | **Crossbeam — Account mapping** — Find overlapping customers and prospects with each partner to decide who to recruit and where to co-sell. |
| 35 | **Jay McBain (Canalys) — Partner ecosystem influence** — Map every partner type that influences the buyer (referral, reseller, integration, services) before designing tiers and incentives. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | ## When to Use |
| 38 | |
| 39 | "Build a partner program" |
| 40 | "Partnership strategy" |
| 41 | "Channel partner program" |
| 42 | "Partner-led growth" |
| 43 | |
| 44 | ## Step-by-Step Process |
| 45 | |
| 46 | ### Phase 1: Partner Type Selection |
| 47 | |
| 48 | **Integration partners:** Your product integrates with theirs. Co-marketing, |
| 49 | co-selling. Easiest to start. "Customers who use [Partner] + [You] get [value]." |
| 50 | **Referral partners:** Agencies, consultants, freelancers who recommend tools. |
| 51 | Pay % of first-year revenue. Low-touch to manage. |
| 52 | **Reseller partners:** Sell your product to their customers. White-label or |
| 53 | co-branded. Higher touch; model margin and support obligations from actual unit economics. |
| 54 | **Technology partners:** Complementary (not competitive) tools. Shared customer |
| 55 | base. Joint roadmap, deep integration. |
| 56 | **Strategic alliances:** Enterprise partnerships. Exclusive. Long sales cycle |
| 57 | to set up, massive payoff. |
| 58 | |
| 59 | ### Phase 2: Partner Recruitment |
| 60 | |
| 61 | **Ideal Partner Profile (IPP):** Who has your ICP before you do? Agencies, |
| 62 | consultants, complementary tools, industry associations. |
| 63 | **Outbound recruitment:** "Your clients ask you about [problem] — we solve it. |
| 64 | Let's build a referral relationship." |
| 65 | **Inbound recruitment:** Partner page on your website, partner application form, |
| 66 | promote in your network. |
| 67 | **Customer → Partner:** Your power users often become your best partners. |
| 68 | |
| 69 | ### Phase 3: Partner Enablement |
| 70 | |
| 71 | **Partner portal:** Deal registration, training materials, co-branded assets, |
| 72 | pipeline tracking |
| 73 | **Certification:** Product certification program. Certified partners get higher |
| 74 | commissions and better leads. |
| 75 | **Sales playbook:** How to position your product, who to sell to, objection |
| 76 | handling, demo script |
| 77 | **Co-marketing:** Joint webinars, co-branded case studies, shared booth at events |
| 78 | |
| 79 | ### Phase 4: Partner Economics |
| 80 | |
| 81 | **Referral:** Set a time-bounded fee from contribution margin, attribution, and local rules. |
| 82 | **Reseller:** Model margin against enablement, support, discounting, and channel conflict. |
| 83 | **Agency/Consultant:** Monthly retainer + % of influenced revenue |
| 84 | **Strategic:** Custom deal, equity possible at early stage |
| 85 | **Key metric:** Partner-sourced and partner-influenced pipeline as a percentage |
| 86 | of eligible pipeline, reported separately with documented attribution rules. |
| 87 | |
| 88 | ### Phase 5: Partner Management |
| 89 | |
| 90 | **Tier system:** Silver → Gold → Platinum based on revenue influenced |
| 91 | **QBRs:** Quarterly business reviews with top 20% of partners |
| 92 | **Partner success manager:** Dedicated person at 30+ active partners |
| 93 | **Kill criteria:** Partners who refer 0 deals in 6 months → re-evaluate or remove |
| 94 | |
| 95 | ## Output Format |
| 96 | |
| 97 | Partnership strategy document with: partner types and tiers, IPP definition, |
| 98 | recruitment plan, enablement program, economics model, and management framework. |
| 99 | |
| 100 | ## Quality Check |
| 101 | |
| 102 | Before delivering, verify: |
| 103 | |
| 104 | [ ] All required sections are complete |
| 105 | [ ] Output matches the user's stated need |
| 106 | [ ] Named frameworks are cited for key recommendations |
| 107 | [ ] No vague claims — every recommendation has a specific action |
| 108 | [ ] Deliverable is ready for operational use, not just conceptual |
| 109 | |
| 110 | ## Common Pitfalls |
| 111 | |
| 112 | **Skipping research.** Building output without understanding the specific context. Fix: always gather required inputs before producing deliverables. |
| 113 | **Generic output.** "Improve your process" without concrete steps. Fix: every recommendation must include a specific action, timeline, and owner. |
| 114 | **Missing framework citations.** Advice without named authorities. Fix: ground every recommendation in a cited framework from a recognized authority. |
| 115 | |
| 116 | ## Execution Artifacts |
| 117 | |
| 118 | `references/framework-notes.md` — named frameworks, citation anchors, and operating assumptions |
| 119 | `templates/output-template.md` — copy-paste deliverable structure for the user |
| 120 | `scripts/check-output.py` — local checklist validator for required sections |
| 121 | This skill includes lightweight artifacts the agent can load on demand: |
| 122 | Use the artifacts when the user asks for an implementation-ready deliverable, a repeatable workflow, or a quality check rather than generic advice. |
| 123 | |
| 124 | ## Implementation Depth |
| 125 | |
| 126 | Use this section when the user asks for a finished asset, not a high-level explanation. |
| 127 | |
| 128 | ### Diagnostic Questions |
| 129 | |
| 130 | What is the primary motion: founder-led, sales-led, product-led, partner-led, or lifecycle-led? |
| 131 | Which ICP tier is the output for: small business, mid-market, enterprise, or mixed? |
| 132 | What proof is available today: customer stories, usage data, third-party validation, screenshots, or none? |
| 133 | What system will execute the work: CRM, sequencer, warehouse, support desk, product analytics, or manual workflow? |
| 134 | What decision will the user make from this output: launch, prioritize, route, rewrite, score, coach, or measure? |
| 135 | |
| 136 | ### Framework Application |
| 137 | |
| 138 | Map the recommendation explicitly to the named frameworks in this skill: |
| 139 | |
| 140 | Partnership Ecosystem Framework: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 141 | Crossbeam Partner-Led Growth: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 142 | Crossbeam — Ecosystem-Led Growth: apply only the part that directly improves the requested deliverable. |
| 143 | |
| 144 | ### Deliverable Standard |
| 145 | |
| 146 | A strong output from this skill includes: |
| 147 | |
| 148 | A crisp diagnosis of the current situation |
| 149 | A recommended path with tradeoffs, not a generic list |
| 150 | A concrete artifact the user can use immediately: table, script, checklist, scorecard, sequence, dashboard spec, or implementation plan |
| 151 | A measurement plan with leading and lagging indicators |
| 152 | Risks and edge cases called out before execution |
| 153 | |
| 154 | ### Adaptation Rules |
| 155 | |
| 156 | For small business: reduce complexity, shorten time-to-value, and prioritize owner/operator clarity. |
| 157 | For mid-market: include workflow ownership, handoffs, integrations, and enablement assets. |
| 158 | For enterprise: include governance, risk, procurement, stakeholder mapping, and proof requirements. |
| 159 | |
| 160 | ## Related Skills |
| 161 | |
| 162 | partner-programs, co-marketing, integration-partnerships, channel-partnerships, sales-enablement |
| 163 |
Details
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 62
- Checked
- Source
- LeadMagic/gtm-skills ↗
- Creator
- LeadMagic · 129 listings
Similar skills
See all →
AgentPhase 2: Foundation Scaffolding
AgentNEXUS Network Framework
SkillAnsoff Matrix Generator
SkillArchitecture Advisor
SkillCareer Skills Translator
SkillMarketing Skills CollectionMore from LeadMagic
SkillStrategic Account Marketing
SkillCluster Account Marketing
SkillProgrammatic Account Targeting
SkillAccount Strategy Designer
SkillTarget Account Selector