Feature Risk Validator
Identify assumptions existing

Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking.
--- name: identify-assumptions-existing description: "Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping." --- ## Identify Assumptions (Existing Product) Devil's advocate analysis to surface risky assumptions across four risk areas. ### Context You are stress-testing a feature idea for **$ARGUMENTS**. If the user provides files (designs, PRDs, research), read them first. ### Instructions The user will describe their product, objective, market segment, and feature idea. Work through these steps:
Overview
Devil's advocate analysis to surface risky assumptions across four risk areas.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add phuryn/pm-skills --skill identify-assumptions-existing -g -a claude-codenpx degit phuryn/pm-skills/pm-product-discovery/skills/identify-assumptions-existing#main ~/.claude/skills/identify-assumptions-existingConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md2.1 KB
Read SKILL.md here
Show the full text45 lines
Identify Assumptions (Existing Product)
Devil's advocate analysis to surface risky assumptions across four risk areas.
Context
You are stress-testing a feature idea for $ARGUMENTS.
If the user provides files (designs, PRDs, research), read them first.
Instructions
The user will describe their product, objective, market segment, and feature idea. Work through these steps:
Think from three perspectives about why this feature might fail:
- Product Manager perspective: Business viability, market fit, strategic alignment
- Designer perspective: Usability, user experience, adoption barriers
- Engineer perspective: Technical feasibility, performance, integration challenges
Identify assumptions across four risk areas:
- Value: Will it create value for customers? Does it solve a real problem?
- Usability: Will users figure out how to use it? Is the learning curve acceptable?
- Viability: Can marketing, sales, finance, and legal support it?
- Feasibility: Can it be built with existing technology? Are there integration risks?
For each assumption, note:
- What specifically could go wrong
- How confident you are (High/Medium/Low)
- Suggested way to test it
Think step by step. Be thorough but constructive — the goal is to strengthen the idea, not kill it.
Further Reading
| 1 | |
| 2 | name identify-assumptions-existing |
| 3 | description "Identify risky assumptions for a feature idea in an existing product across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility. Uses multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking. Use when stress-testing a feature idea, doing risk assessment, or preparing for assumption mapping." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | ## Identify Assumptions (Existing Product) |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Devil's advocate analysis to surface risky assumptions across four risk areas. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ### Context |
| 11 | |
| 12 | You are stress-testing a feature idea for **$ARGUMENTS**. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | If the user provides files (designs, PRDs, research), read them first. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | ### Instructions |
| 17 | |
| 18 | The user will describe their product, objective, market segment, and feature idea. Work through these steps: |
| 19 | |
| 20 | **Think from three perspectives** about why this feature might fail: |
| 21 | **Product Manager perspective**: Business viability, market fit, strategic alignment |
| 22 | **Designer perspective**: Usability, user experience, adoption barriers |
| 23 | **Engineer perspective**: Technical feasibility, performance, integration challenges |
| 24 | |
| 25 | **Identify assumptions across four risk areas**: |
| 26 | **Value**: Will it create value for customers? Does it solve a real problem? |
| 27 | **Usability**: Will users figure out how to use it? Is the learning curve acceptable? |
| 28 | **Viability**: Can marketing, sales, finance, and legal support it? |
| 29 | **Feasibility**: Can it be built with existing technology? Are there integration risks? |
| 30 | |
| 31 | **For each assumption**, note: |
| 32 | What specifically could go wrong |
| 33 | How confident you are (High/Medium/Low) |
| 34 | Suggested way to test it |
| 35 | |
| 36 | Think step by step. Be thorough but constructive — the goal is to strengthen the idea, not kill it. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | |
| 40 | ### Further Reading |
| 41 | |
| 42 | [Assumption Prioritization Canvas: How to Identify And Test The Right Assumptions] |
| 43 | [How to Manage Risks as a Product Manager] |
| 44 | [Continuous Product Discovery Masterclass (CPDM)] (video course) |
| 45 |
Details
- Updated
- Sep 14, 2026
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 26,557
- Checked
- Source
- phuryn/pm-skills ↗
- Creator
- phuryn · 69 listings
Similar skills
See all →
SkillImplement Spec
SkillAcademy Guide
SkillFeature Request Prioritizer
SkillAdvocacy Program Designer
SkillModel-Driven App Builder
SkillCinetic Motion EngineMore from phuryn
SkillA/B Test Analyzer
SkillFeature Request Prioritizer
SkillAnsoff Matrix Generator
SkillAI Text Humanizer
SkillMarket Segment Identifier
SkillProduct Experiment Designer