Multi-Agent System Designer
Agent Designer — Multi-Agent System Architecture

Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples:…
--- name: "agent-designer" description: "Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer)." --- # Agent Designer — Multi-Agent System Architecture Design, schema-generate, and evaluate multi-agent systems with three deterministic tools. The scripts are the workflow — do not freehand an architecture when the planner can score one from requirements. ## When to use - Designing a new multi-agent system from requirements (pattern choice, roles, comms) - Generating provider-ready tool schemas (Anthropic + OpenAI formats) from plain tool descriptions - Evaluating execution logs: success rate, latency distribution, cost, bottlenecks **When NOT to use:** Claude Code Workflow-tool automations → `workflow-builder`; single-agent workflow scaffolds → `agent-workflow-designer`; multi-agent fan-out at runtime → `agenthub`. ## Pattern decision table
Overview
Design, schema-generate, and evaluate multi-agent systems with three deterministic tools. The scripts are the workflow — do not freehand an architecture when the planner can score one from requirements.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill agent-designer -g -a claude-codemkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tar.gz/19392f7a0826 \
| tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=3 claude-skills-19392f7a0826/engineering/skills/agent-designerNew-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/daf49eea86ee0c1a920d/agent-designer.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\agent-designer.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\agent-designer.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -ForceConnects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md4.1 KBREADME.md12.2 KBagent_evaluator.py52.3 KBagent_planner.py38.0 KBtool_schema_generator.py36.9 KBassets/3 files · 33.5 KBexpected_outputs/3 files · 40.3 KBreferences/3 files · 43.0 KB
Read the files here
alirezarezvani/
- agent_evaluator.py52.3 KB
- agent_planner.py38.0 KB
- README.md12.2 KB
- SKILL.md4.1 KB
- tool_schema_generator.py36.9 KB
- sample_execution_logs.json15.5 KB
- sample_system_requirements.json2.2 KB
- sample_tool_descriptions.json15.7 KB
Show the full text77 lines
Agent Designer — Multi-Agent System Architecture
Design, schema-generate, and evaluate multi-agent systems with three deterministic tools. The scripts are the workflow — do not freehand an architecture when the planner can score one from requirements.
When to use
- Designing a new multi-agent system from requirements (pattern choice, roles, comms)
- Generating provider-ready tool schemas (Anthropic + OpenAI formats) from plain tool descriptions
- Evaluating execution logs: success rate, latency distribution, cost, bottlenecks
When NOT to use: Claude Code Workflow-tool automations → workflow-builder; single-agent workflow scaffolds → agent-workflow-designer; multi-agent fan-out at runtime → agenthub.
Pattern decision table
| Choose | When | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|
| Single agent | One bounded task, < ~5 tools | Don't add agents you don't need |
| Supervisor | Central decomposition, specialists report back | Supervisor becomes the bottleneck |
| Pipeline | Strictly sequential stages with handoffs | Rigid order; slowest stage gates throughput |
| Hierarchical | Multiple org layers, > ~8 agents | Communication overhead per level |
| Swarm | Parallel peers, fault tolerance over predictability | Hard to debug; needs consensus rules |
The planner applies this scoring deterministically — run it rather than picking by feel.
Workflow
All paths relative to this skill folder. Each step's JSON output is the next step's design input.
1. Design the architecture
Write a requirements JSON (copy assets/sample_system_requirements.json — keys: goal, tasks[], constraints{max_response_time, budget_per_task, concurrent_tasks}, team_size):
python3 agent_planner.py requirements.json --format json -o arch
Emits arch.json with architecture_design (pattern, agents, communication links), mermaid_diagram, and implementation_roadmap. Read architecture_design.pattern and the per-agent role list; present the mermaid diagram to the user.
2. Generate tool schemas
Describe each agent's tools in plain JSON (copy assets/sample_tool_descriptions.json), then:
python3 tool_schema_generator.py tool_descriptions.json --validate -o tools
Emits tools.json (tool_schemas, validation_summary) plus provider-specific tools_anthropic.json / tools_openai.json. Gate: every tool must print ✓ Valid. Fix any invalid schema before proceeding — never hand an agent an unvalidated schema.
3. Evaluate execution logs
Once the system runs (or against assets/sample_execution_logs.json for a dry run):
python3 agent_evaluator.py execution_logs.json --detailed -o eval
Emits eval.json with summary, agent_metrics, bottleneck_analysis, error_analysis, cost_breakdown, sla_compliance, and optimization_recommendations, plus split files (eval_errors.json, eval_recommendations.json).
4. Verification loop
The design is not done until:
tool_schema_generator.py --validatereports 0 invalid schemas.agent_evaluator.pyon a pilot run reports 0 critical issues (the tool printsCRITICAL: N critical issueswhen found). If N > 0, apply the top item ineval_recommendations.json, re-run the pilot, and re-evaluate.- Compare your outputs against
expected_outputs/to confirm the schema shape you're consuming hasn't drifted.
References
references/agent_architecture_patterns.md— pattern trade-offs in depthreferences/tool_design_best_practices.md— schema, idempotency, error-handling rulesreferences/evaluation_methodology.md— metric definitions the evaluator implements
| 1 | |
| 2 | name "agent-designer" |
| 3 | description "Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer)." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Agent Designer — Multi-Agent System Architecture |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Design, schema-generate, and evaluate multi-agent systems with three deterministic tools. The scripts are the workflow — do not freehand an architecture when the planner can score one from requirements. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ## When to use |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Designing a new multi-agent system from requirements (pattern choice, roles, comms) |
| 13 | Generating provider-ready tool schemas (Anthropic + OpenAI formats) from plain tool descriptions |
| 14 | Evaluating execution logs: success rate, latency distribution, cost, bottlenecks |
| 15 | |
| 16 | **When NOT to use:** Claude Code Workflow-tool automations → `workflow-builder`; single-agent workflow scaffolds → `agent-workflow-designer`; multi-agent fan-out at runtime → `agenthub`. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ## Pattern decision table |
| 19 | |
| 20 | | Choose | When | Watch out for | |
| 21 | |---|---|---| |
| 22 | | Single agent | One bounded task, < ~5 tools | Don't add agents you don't need | |
| 23 | | Supervisor | Central decomposition, specialists report back | Supervisor becomes the bottleneck | |
| 24 | | Pipeline | Strictly sequential stages with handoffs | Rigid order; slowest stage gates throughput | |
| 25 | | Hierarchical | Multiple org layers, > ~8 agents | Communication overhead per level | |
| 26 | | Swarm | Parallel peers, fault tolerance over predictability | Hard to debug; needs consensus rules | |
| 27 | |
| 28 | The planner applies this scoring deterministically — run it rather than picking by feel. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | ## Workflow |
| 31 | |
| 32 | All paths relative to this skill folder. Each step's JSON output is the next step's design input. |
| 33 | |
| 34 | ### 1. Design the architecture |
| 35 | |
| 36 | Write a requirements JSON (copy `assets/sample_system_requirements.json` — keys: `goal`, `tasks[]`, `constraints{max_response_time, budget_per_task, concurrent_tasks}`, `team_size`): |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | python3 agent_planner.py requirements.json --format json -o arch |
| 40 | |
| 41 | |
| 42 | Emits `arch.json` with `architecture_design` (pattern, agents, communication links), `mermaid_diagram`, and `implementation_roadmap`. Read `architecture_design.pattern` and the per-agent role list; present the mermaid diagram to the user. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | ### 2. Generate tool schemas |
| 45 | |
| 46 | Describe each agent's tools in plain JSON (copy `assets/sample_tool_descriptions.json`), then: |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 49 | python3 tool_schema_generator.py tool_descriptions.json --validate -o tools |
| 50 | |
| 51 | |
| 52 | Emits `tools.json` (`tool_schemas`, `validation_summary`) plus provider-specific `tools_anthropic.json` / `tools_openai.json`. **Gate: every tool must print `✓ Valid`.** Fix any invalid schema before proceeding — never hand an agent an unvalidated schema. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | ### 3. Evaluate execution logs |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Once the system runs (or against `assets/sample_execution_logs.json` for a dry run): |
| 57 | |
| 58 | |
| 59 | python3 agent_evaluator.py execution_logs.json --detailed -o eval |
| 60 | |
| 61 | |
| 62 | Emits `eval.json` with `summary`, `agent_metrics`, `bottleneck_analysis`, `error_analysis`, `cost_breakdown`, `sla_compliance`, and `optimization_recommendations`, plus split files (`eval_errors.json`, `eval_recommendations.json`). |
| 63 | |
| 64 | ### 4. Verification loop |
| 65 | |
| 66 | The design is not done until: |
| 67 | |
| 68 | `tool_schema_generator.py --validate` reports 0 invalid schemas. |
| 69 | `agent_evaluator.py` on a pilot run reports **0 critical issues** (the tool prints `CRITICAL: N critical issues` when found). If N > 0, apply the top item in `eval_recommendations.json`, re-run the pilot, and re-evaluate. |
| 70 | Compare your outputs against `expected_outputs/` to confirm the schema shape you're consuming hasn't drifted. |
| 71 | |
| 72 | ## References |
| 73 | |
| 74 | `references/agent_architecture_patterns.md` — pattern trade-offs in depth |
| 75 | `references/tool_design_best_practices.md` — schema, idempotency, error-handling rules |
| 76 | `references/evaluation_methodology.md` — metric definitions the evaluator implements |
| 77 |
Details
- Updated
- Aug 30, 2026
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 26,349
- Checked
- Source
- alirezarezvani/claude-skills ↗
- Creator
- alirezarezvani · 363 listings
Similar skills
See all →
SkillCustom Diagram Designer
SkillArchitecture Pattern Reviewer
SkillArchitecture Diagram Creator
SkillArchitecture Diagram Generator
SkillLLM Knowledge Distillation
SkillSoftware Design PhilosophyMore from alirezarezvani
SkillExperiment Resume Tool
SkillExperiment Dashboard Viewer
SkillAutonomous Experiment Runner
SkillSingle Experiment Iterator
SkillAutoresearch Experiment Setup
SkillExecutive Boardroom Deliberator