Skills · Content & docs

Make Your Writing Sound Human Again

Unverified30/40

Paste writing that sounds stiff or robotic and get back a cleaner version with the filler, clichés and buzzwords stripped out.

Originally by Hardik Pandya (https://hvpandya.com) · MIT

Claude CodePartialHas SKILL.md but declares no allowed-tools — Claude Code will ask for permission each time
CursorPartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no Cursor rules file
CodexPartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no AGENTS.md
Gemini CLIPartialPlain prose you can paste in
CopilotPartialPlain prose you can paste in — but no Copilot instructions file
npx agentalley add stop-slop

This command does not work yet — the CLI is still being built. Until then, use Raw in the reader below to take the file.

Who is stuck, and on what

Your emails and posts come out sounding generic and overpolished, full of phrases everyone uses and nobody means. You want them to read like a real person wrote them, not a template.

What it gives you

A rewritten version of your text with filler phrases, buzzwords, empty adverbs and clichéd sentence patterns removed, kept in plain direct language.

When NOT to use it

It will not invent new facts or write your piece from scratch, it only cleans up text you already have.

The whole source

No sign-in, no blur, nothing truncated
stop-slop/SKILL.md394 lines12.1 KBRawView on GitHub
Frontmatter — 4 properties
namestop-slop
descriptionRemove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells and produce more human-like writing.
licenseMIT
metadata author: Hardik Pandya (https://hvpandya.com) source: https://github.com/hardikpandya/stop-slop version: "2.0.0 updated: "2026-03-17
1---
2name: stop-slop
3description: Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells and produce more human-like writing.
4license: MIT
5metadata:
6 author: Hardik Pandya (https://hvpandya.com)
7 source: https://github.com/hardikpandya/stop-slop
8 version: "2.0.0"
9 updated: "2026-03-17"
10---A5No allowed-tools declared — no way to tell what this skill may touch
11 
12# Stop Slop
13 
14Eliminate predictable AI writing patterns from prose.
15 
16## Core Rules
17 
181. **Cut filler phrases.** Remove throat-clearing openers, emphasis crutches, and all adverbs. See Phrases to Remove below.
19 
202. **Break formulaic structures.** Avoid binary contrasts, negative listings, dramatic fragmentation, rhetorical setups, false agency. See Structures to Avoid below.
21 
223. **Use active voice.** Every sentence needs a human subject doing something. No passive constructions. No inanimate objects performing human actions ("the complaint becomes a fix").
23 
244. **Be specific.** No vague declaratives ("The reasons are structural"). Name the specific thing. No lazy extremes ("every," "always," "never") doing vague work.
25 
265. **Put the reader in the room.** No narrator-from-a-distance voice. "You" beats "People." Specifics beat abstractions.
27 
286. **Vary rhythm.** Mix sentence lengths. Two items beat three. End paragraphs differently. No em dashes.
29 
307. **Trust readers.** State facts directly. Skip softening, justification, hand-holding.
31 
328. **Cut quotables.** If it sounds like a pull-quote, rewrite it.
33 
34## Quick Checks
35 
36Before delivering prose:
37 
38- Any adverbs? Kill them.
39- Any passive voice? Find the actor, make them the subject.
40- Inanimate thing doing a human verb ("the decision emerges")? Name the person.
41- Sentence starts with a Wh- word? Restructure it.
42- Any "here's what/this/that" throat-clearing? Cut to the point.
43- Any "not X, it's Y" contrasts? State Y directly.
44- Three consecutive sentences match length? Break one.
45- Paragraph ends with punchy one-liner? Vary it.
46- Em-dash anywhere? Remove it.
47- Vague declarative ("The implications are significant")? Name the specific implication.
48- Narrator-from-a-distance ("Nobody designed this")? Put the reader in the scene.
49- Meta-joiners ("The rest of this essay...")? Delete. Let the essay move.
50 
51## Scoring
52 
53Rate 1-10 on each dimension:
54 
55| Dimension | Question |
56|-----------|----------|
57| Directness | Statements or announcements? |
58| Rhythm | Varied or metronomic? |
59| Trust | Respects reader intelligence? |
60| Authenticity | Sounds human? |
61| Density | Anything cuttable? |
62 
63Below 35/50: revise.
64 
65---
66 
67## Phrases to Remove
68 
69### Throat-Clearing Openers
70 
71Remove these announcement phrases. State the content directly.
72 
73- "Here's the thing:"
74- "Here's what [X]"
75- "Here's this [X]"
76- "Here's that [X]"
77- "Here's why [X]"
78- "The uncomfortable truth is"
79- "It turns out"
80- "The real [X] is"
81- "Let me be clear"
82- "The truth is,"
83- "I'll say it again:"
84- "I'm going to be honest"
85- "Can we talk about"
86- "Here's what I find interesting"
87- "Here's the problem though"
88 
89Any "here's what/this/that" construction is throat-clearing before the point. Cut it and state the point.
90 
91### Emphasis Crutches
92 
93These add no meaning. Delete them.
94 
95- "Full stop." / "Period."
96- "Let that sink in."
97- "This matters because"
98- "Make no mistake"
99- "Here's why that matters"
100 
101### Business Jargon
102 
103Replace with plain language.
104 
105| Avoid | Use instead |
106|-------|-------------|
107| Navigate (challenges) | Handle, address |
108| Unpack (analysis) | Explain, examine |
109| Lean into | Accept, embrace |
110| Landscape (context) | Situation, field |
111| Game-changer | Significant, important |
112| Double down | Commit, increase |
113| Deep dive | Analysis, examination |
114| Take a step back | Reconsider |
115| Moving forward | Next, from now |
116| Circle back | Return to, revisit |
117| On the same page | Aligned, agreed |
118 
119### Adverbs
120 
121Kill all adverbs. No -ly words. No softeners, no intensifiers, no hedges.
122 
123Specific offenders:
124 
125- "really"
126- "just"
127- "literally"
128- "genuinely"
129- "honestly"
130- "simply"
131- "actually"
132- "deeply"
133- "truly"
134- "fundamentally"
135- "inherently"
136- "inevitably"
137- "interestingly"
138- "importantly"
139- "crucially"
140 
141Also cut these filler phrases:
142 
143- "At its core"
144- "In today's [X]"
145- "It's worth noting"
146- "At the end of the day"
147- "When it comes to"
148- "In a world where"
149- "The reality is"
150 
151### Meta-Commentary
152 
153Remove self-referential asides. The essay should move, not announce its own structure.
154 
155- "Hint:"
156- "Plot twist:" / "Spoiler:"
157- "You already know this, but"
158- "But that's another post"
159- "X is a feature, not a bug"
160- "Dressed up as"
161- "The rest of this essay explains..."
162- "Let me walk you through..."
163- "In this section, we'll..."
164- "As we'll see..."
165- "I want to explore..."
166 
167### Performative Emphasis
168 
169False intimacy or manufactured sincerity:
170 
171- "creeps in"
172- "I promise"
173- "They exist, I promise"
174 
175### Telling Instead of Showing
176 
177Announcing difficulty or significance rather than demonstrating it:
178 
179- "This is genuinely hard"
180- "This is what leadership actually looks like"
181- "This is what X actually looks like"
182- "actually matters"
183 
184### Vague Declaratives
185 
186Sentences that announce importance without naming the specific thing. Kill these.
187 
188- "The reasons are structural"
189- "The implications are significant"
190- "This is the deepest problem"
191- "The stakes are high"
192- "The consequences are real"
193 
194If a sentence says something is important/deep/structural without showing the specific thing, cut it or replace it with the specific thing.
195 
196---
197 
198## Structures to Avoid
199 
200### Binary Contrasts
201 
202These create false drama. State the point directly.
203 
204| Pattern | Problem |
205|---------|---------|
206| "Not because X. Because Y." / "Not because X, but because Y." | Telegraphed reversal |
207| "[X] isn't the problem. [Y] is." | Formulaic reframe |
208| "The answer isn't X. It's Y." | Predictable pivot |
209| "It feels like X. It's actually Y." | Setup/reveal cliche |
210| "The question isn't X. It's Y." | Rhetorical misdirection |
211| "Not X. But Y." / "not X, it's Y" / "isn't X, it's Y" | Mechanical contrast |
212| "It's not this. It's that." | Same formula, different words |
213| "stops being X and starts being Y" | False transformation arc |
214| "doesn't mean X, but actually Y" | Negation-then-assertion crutch |
215| "is about X but not Y" | False distinction |
216| "not just X but also Y" | Additive hedge |
217 
218**Instead:** State Y directly. "The problem is Y." "Y matters here." Drop the negation entirely.
219 
220### Negative Listing
221 
222Listing what something is *not* before revealing what it *is*. A rhetorical striptease.
223 
224| Pattern | Problem |
225|---------|---------|
226| "Not a X... Not a Y... A Z." | Dramatic buildup through negation |
227| "It wasn't X. It wasn't Y. It was Z." | Same structure, past tense |
228 
229**Instead:** State Z. The reader doesn't need the runway.
230 
231### Dramatic Fragmentation
232 
233Sentence fragments for emphasis read as manufactured profundity.
234 
235| Pattern | Problem |
236|---------|---------|
237| "[Noun]. That's it. That's the [thing]." | Performative simplicity |
238| "X. And Y. And Z." | Staccato drama |
239| "This unlocks something. [Word]." | Artificial revelation |
240 
241**Instead:** Complete sentences. Trust content over presentation.
242 
243### Rhetorical Setups
244 
245These announce insight rather than deliver it.
246 
247| Pattern | Problem |
248|---------|---------|
249| "What if [reframe]?" | Socratic posturing |
250| "Here's what I mean:" | Redundant preview |
251| "Think about it:" | Condescending prompt |
252| "And that's okay." | Unnecessary permission |
253 
254**Instead:** Make the point. Let readers draw conclusions.
255 
256### Formulaic Constructions
257 
258| Pattern | Problem |
259|---------|---------|
260| "By the time X, I was Y." | Narrative template |
261| "X that isn't Y" | Indirect. Say "X is broken" |
262 
263### False Agency
264 
265Giving inanimate things human verbs. Complaints don't "become" fixes. Bets don't "live or die." Decisions don't "emerge." A person does something to make those things happen. AI loves this because it avoids naming the actor.
266 
267| Pattern | Problem |
268|---------|---------|
269| "a complaint becomes a fix" | The complaint did nothing. Someone fixed it. |
270| "a bet lives or dies in days" | Bets don't have lifespans. Someone kills the project or ships it. |
271| "the decision emerges" | Decisions don't emerge. Someone decides. |
272| "the culture shifts" | Cultures don't shift on their own. People change behavior. |
273| "the conversation moves toward" | Conversations don't move. Someone steers. |
274| "the data tells us" | Data sits there. Someone reads it and draws a conclusion. |
275| "the market rewards" | Markets don't reward. Buyers pay for things. |
276 
277**Instead:** Name the human. "The team fixed it that week" beats "the complaint becomes a fix." If no specific person fits, use "you" to put the reader in the seat.
278 
279### Narrator-from-a-Distance
280 
281Floating above the scene instead of putting the reader in it.
282 
283| Pattern | Problem |
284|---------|---------|
285| "Nobody designed this." | Disembodied observation |
286| "This happens because..." | Lecturer voice |
287| "This is why..." | Same |
288| "People tend to..." | Armchair sociologist |
289 
290**Instead:** Put the reader in the room. "You don't sit down one day and decide to..." beats "Nobody designed this."
291 
292### Passive Voice
293 
294Every sentence needs a subject doing something. Passive voice hides the actor and drains energy.
295 
296| Pattern | Fix |
297|---------|-----|
298| "X was created" | Name who created it |
299| "It is believed that" | Name who believes it |
300| "Mistakes were made" | Name who made them |
301| "The decision was reached" | Name who decided |
302 
303**Instead:** Find the actor. Put them at the front of the sentence.
304 
305### Sentence Starters to Avoid
306 
307| Pattern | Fix |
308|---------|-----|
309| Sentences starting with What, When, Where, Which, Who, Why, How | Restructure. Lead with the subject or the verb. |
310| Paragraphs starting with "So" | Start with content |
311| Sentences starting with "Look," | Remove |
312 
313Wh- openers become a crutch. "What makes this hard is..." becomes "The constraint is..." or better, name the specific constraint.
314 
315### Rhythm Patterns
316 
317| Pattern | Fix |
318|---------|-----|
319| Three-item lists | Use two items or one |
320| Questions answered immediately | Let questions breathe or cut them |
321| Every paragraph ends punchily | Vary endings |
322| Em-dashes | Remove. Use commas or periods. No em dashes at all. |
323| Staccato fragmentation | Don't stack short punchy sentences |
324| "Not always. Not perfectly." | Hedging disguised as reassurance |
325 
326### Word Patterns
327 
328| Pattern | Problem |
329|---------|---------|
330| Lazy extremes (every, always, never, everyone, everybody, nobody) | False authority. Use specifics instead of sweeping claims. |
331| All adverbs (-ly words, "really," "just," "literally," "genuinely," "honestly," "simply," "actually") | Empty emphasis. See Adverbs section above. |
332 
333---
334 
335## Examples
336 
337### Example 1: Throat-Clearing + Binary Contrast
338 
339**Before:**
340> "Here's the thing: building products is hard. Not because the technology is complex. Because people are complex. Let that sink in."
341 
342**After:**
343> "Building products is hard. Technology is manageable. People aren't."
344 
345**Changes:** Removed opener, binary contrast structure, and emphasis crutch. Direct statements.
346 
347---
348 
349### Example 2: Filler + Unnecessary Reassurance
350 
351**Before:**
352> "It turns out that most teams struggle with alignment. The uncomfortable truth is that nobody wants to admit they're confused. And that's okay."
353 
354**After:**
355> "Teams struggle with alignment. Nobody admits confusion."
356 
357**Changes:** Cut hedging ("most"), removed throat-clearing phrases, deleted permission-granting ending.
358 
359---
360 
361### Example 3: Business Jargon Stack
362 
363**Before:**
364> "In today's fast-paced landscape, we need to lean into discomfort and navigate uncertainty with clarity. This matters because your competition isn't waiting."
365 
366**After:**
367> "Move faster. Your competition is."
368 
369**Changes:** Eliminated jargon entirely. Core message in six words.
370 
371---
372 
373### Example 4: Dramatic Fragmentation
374 
375**Before:**
376> "Speed. Quality. Cost. You can only pick two. That's it. That's the tradeoff."
377 
378**After:**
379> "Speed, quality, cost—pick two."
380 
381**Changes:** Single sentence. No performative emphasis.
382 
383---
384 
385### Example 5: Rhetorical Setup
386 
387**Before:**
388> "What if I told you that the best teams don't optimize for productivity? Here's what I mean: they optimize for learning. Think about it."
389 
390**After:**
391> "The best teams optimize for learning, not productivity."
392 
393**Changes:** Direct claim. No rhetorical scaffolding.
394 

Reviews

Installed this one?Write the first review and take the Trailblazer badge.

Reviews only open after a real install, so this is empty — and we leave it empty rather than invent one.

Alternatives

Also in Content & docs