Agreement Review Service
Contract Review Skill
Review and summarise any contract or legal agreement. Use when asked to review a contract, check an agreement, flag legal risks, or summarise key clauses.
--- name: contract-review description: "Review and summarise any contract or legal agreement. Use when asked to review a contract, check an agreement, flag legal risks, or summarise key clauses. Produces a structured review with key terms, flagged clauses, risk rating, and plain English summary. Not a substitute for qualified legal advice." --- # Contract Review Skill This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice. ## Required Inputs - **Contract text or description** (paste or describe) - **Reviewer role** (e.g. the party signing, their legal team, a business owner) - **Contract type** (e.g. SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, supplier contract) - **Key concerns** (optional — e.g. "focus on IP ownership and termination clauses") ## Output Structure ### 1. Contract Overview
Overview
This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice.
Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Code
npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill contract-review -g -a claude-codeClaude Code (manual)
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills && curl -sL https://codeload.github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tar.gz/f6ca79348c55 \
| tar -xz -C ~/.claude/skills --strip-components=2 pm-claude-skills-f6ca79348c55/skills/contract-reviewWindows (PowerShell)
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$HOME\.claude\skills" | Out-Null; Invoke-WebRequest "https://m.agentalley.io/zip/1f5919620862e5e418f6/contract-review.zip" -OutFile "$env:TEMP\contract-review.zip"; Expand-Archive "$env:TEMP\contract-review.zip" -DestinationPath "$HOME\.claude\skills" -ForceClaude.ai / desktop
Codex, Cursor, other agents
Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp
Files included
SKILL.md3.0 KB
Read the files here
mohitagw15856/
SKILL.md
Show the full text81 lines
Contract Review Skill
This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice.
Required Inputs
- Contract text or description (paste or describe)
- Reviewer role (e.g. the party signing, their legal team, a business owner)
- Contract type (e.g. SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, supplier contract)
- Key concerns (optional — e.g. "focus on IP ownership and termination clauses")
Output Structure
1. Contract Overview
- Type: [Contract type]
- Parties: [Party A and Party B]
- Effective date / duration: [If stated]
- Governing law: [Jurisdiction]
- Overall risk rating: Green Low / Amber Medium / Red High
2. Key Terms Summary
| Term | Detail |
|---|---|
| Payment / fees | |
| Term and renewal | |
| Termination rights | |
| Liability cap | |
| IP ownership | |
| Confidentiality | |
| Dispute resolution |
3. Flagged Clauses
For each flagged clause:
[Risk level] — [Clause name]
- What it says: [Plain English summary]
- Why it matters: [Risk or implication]
- Suggested action: [Negotiate / Accept / Seek legal advice / Query]
4. Missing Clauses
List any standard clauses absent but normally expected for this contract type.
5. Plain English Summary
3-5 sentences. What does this contract mean for the party signing it?
6. Recommended Next Steps
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
WARNING: This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified solicitor or lawyer before signing any legally binding agreement.
Quality Checks
- Overall risk rating is justified (not just "Medium" without reasons)
- All flagged clauses have a specific recommended action (not just "read this")
- Missing clauses section is completed for this contract type
- Plain English summary can be understood by a non-lawyer
- Disclaimer is included
Anti-Patterns
- Do not provide legal advice or suggest the review substitutes for qualified legal counsel
- Do not skip flagging unusual or one-sided clauses because they appear standard
- Do not omit a plain-English summary — legal jargon alone is not useful output
- Do not rate risk without explaining what specifically drives that rating
- Do not ignore missing clauses — absence of key protections is itself a risk
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Review this contract: [paste]"
- "Flag the key risks in this agreement"
- "Summarise this SaaS contract in plain English"
- "What should I watch out for in this supplier agreement?"
| 1 | |
| 2 | name contract-review |
| 3 | description "Review and summarise any contract or legal agreement. Use when asked to review a contract, check an agreement, flag legal risks, or summarise key clauses. Produces a structured review with key terms, flagged clauses, risk rating, and plain English summary. Not a substitute for qualified legal advice." |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | # Contract Review Skill |
| 7 | |
| 8 | This skill produces a structured contract review identifying key terms, unusual or high-risk clauses, and a plain English summary. Always include the disclaimer that this is not legal advice. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | ## Required Inputs |
| 11 | **Contract text or description** (paste or describe) |
| 12 | **Reviewer role** (e.g. the party signing, their legal team, a business owner) |
| 13 | **Contract type** (e.g. SaaS agreement, employment contract, NDA, supplier contract) |
| 14 | **Key concerns** (optional — e.g. "focus on IP ownership and termination clauses") |
| 15 | |
| 16 | ## Output Structure |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ### 1. Contract Overview |
| 19 | **Type:** [Contract type] |
| 20 | **Parties:** [Party A and Party B] |
| 21 | **Effective date / duration:** [If stated] |
| 22 | **Governing law:** [Jurisdiction] |
| 23 | **Overall risk rating:** Green Low / Amber Medium / Red High |
| 24 | |
| 25 | ### 2. Key Terms Summary |
| 26 | |
| 27 | | Term | Detail | |
| 28 | |---|---| |
| 29 | | Payment / fees | | |
| 30 | | Term and renewal | | |
| 31 | | Termination rights | | |
| 32 | | Liability cap | | |
| 33 | | IP ownership | | |
| 34 | | Confidentiality | | |
| 35 | | Dispute resolution | | |
| 36 | |
| 37 | ### 3. Flagged Clauses |
| 38 | |
| 39 | For each flagged clause: |
| 40 | |
| 41 | **[Risk level] — [Clause name]** |
| 42 | **What it says:** [Plain English summary] |
| 43 | **Why it matters:** [Risk or implication] |
| 44 | **Suggested action:** [Negotiate / Accept / Seek legal advice / Query] |
| 45 | |
| 46 | ### 4. Missing Clauses |
| 47 | List any standard clauses absent but normally expected for this contract type. |
| 48 | |
| 49 | ### 5. Plain English Summary |
| 50 | 3-5 sentences. What does this contract mean for the party signing it? |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ### 6. Recommended Next Steps |
| 53 | [Action 1] |
| 54 | [Action 2] |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 58 | WARNING: This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult a qualified solicitor or lawyer before signing any legally binding agreement. |
| 59 | |
| 60 | ## Quality Checks |
| 61 | |
| 62 | [ ] Overall risk rating is justified (not just "Medium" without reasons) |
| 63 | [ ] All flagged clauses have a specific recommended action (not just "read this") |
| 64 | [ ] Missing clauses section is completed for this contract type |
| 65 | [ ] Plain English summary can be understood by a non-lawyer |
| 66 | [ ] Disclaimer is included |
| 67 | |
| 68 | ## Anti-Patterns |
| 69 | |
| 70 | [ ] Do not provide legal advice or suggest the review substitutes for qualified legal counsel |
| 71 | [ ] Do not skip flagging unusual or one-sided clauses because they appear standard |
| 72 | [ ] Do not omit a plain-English summary — legal jargon alone is not useful output |
| 73 | [ ] Do not rate risk without explaining what specifically drives that rating |
| 74 | [ ] Do not ignore missing clauses — absence of key protections is itself a risk |
| 75 | |
| 76 | ## Example Trigger Phrases |
| 77 | "Review this contract: [paste]" |
| 78 | "Flag the key risks in this agreement" |
| 79 | "Summarise this SaaS contract in plain English" |
| 80 | "What should I watch out for in this supplier agreement?" |
| 81 |
Details
- Updated
- Sep 23, 2026
- License
- MIT
- Stars on the repo
- ★ 1,395
- Checked
- Source
- mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills ↗
- Creator
- mohitagw15856 · 191 listings
Similar skills
See all →
SkillEmployment Agreement Generator
wshobson/agents · by wshobsonCreate employment contracts, offer letters, and HR policy documents following legal best practices. Use when drafting employment agreements, creating HR policies, or standardizing employment documentation.★ 39.9k GitHub stars
SkillNDA Drafter
phuryn/pm-skills · by phurynDraft a detailed Non-Disclosure Agreement between two parties covering information types, jurisdiction, and clauses needing legal review. Use when creating confidentiality agreements or preparing an NDA for a partnership.★ 26.6k GitHub stars
SkillBusiness Document Generator
alirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniGenerate professional, jurisdiction-aware business documents: freelance contracts, project proposals, SOWs, NDAs, and MSAs. Structured Markdown output with docx conversion instructions. Covers US (Delaware), EU (GDPR), UK, and DACH (German law) jurisdictions. Not a substitute for legal counsel — use as strong starting points. Use when drafting a freelance contract, preparing a client proposal, writing an SOW for a new engagement, or producing an NDA before sharing sensitive material.★ 26.3k GitHub stars
SkillStartup Legal Advisoralirezarezvani/claude-skills · by alirezarezvaniGeneral Counsel advisory for startups: contract review (MSA, SaaS, NDA, DPA, employment), IP strategy, term sheet decoding, and regulatory landscape mapping. Use when reviewing any contract or term sheet, deciding when to engage outside counsel, defining IP strategy, evaluating regulatory exposure (HIPAA, GDPR, FDA, fintech), or when user mentions general counsel, GC, legal review, contract risk, term sheet, IP assignment, or regulatory exposure. NOT a substitute for licensed counsel — surfaces questions to bring to qualified attorneys.★ 26.3k GitHub stars
SkillVendor Contract Reviewer
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · by anthropicsLightweight NDA, MSA, and vendor contract review for SMBs without legal on staff. Reads contracts from local files, mail attachments (Gmail or M365), a connected file store (Google Drive or M365), or DocuSign envelopes; flags non-standard terms; explains risks in plain English; and outputs a marked-up redline as a separate DOCX. Use when the user says review this contract," "what am I signing," "red flags," "flag any concerns, check the payment terms," or uploads/forwards a contract or legal agreement.★ 25.5k GitHub stars
SkillInfluencer Contract Builder
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills · by aaron-he-zhuUse when the user asks to "draft an influencer contract", "review these agreement terms", or "build a partnership template"; produces a full influencer agreement framework (scope, compensation, usage rights, exclusivity, FTC disclosure), a clause-by-clause review with red flags, and a negotiation cheat sheet. Not for outreach negotiation before a deal exists — use outreach-manager. 达人合同/合作协议条款审查★ 2.9k GitHub starsMore from mohitagw15856
Skill360 Feedback Survey
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design a 360-degree feedback survey or write a structured 360 feedback report. Use when asked to build a 360 feedback process, write 360 feedback for a colleague, design a feedback survey, or produce a feedback report. Produces either a complete survey instrument with rating scales and open-ended questions, or a structured narrative feedback report with themes, strengths, and development areas.★ 1.4k GitHub stars
SkillExperiment Design Plannermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.★ 1.4k GitHub stars
SkillWeb Accessibility Auditormohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.★ 1.4k GitHub stars
SkillKey Account Plannermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Build a structured account plan for any key customer or target account. Use when asked to create an account plan, key account strategy, strategic account review, or territory plan. Produces a complete account plan with relationship map, growth opportunities, risks, and 90-day action plan.★ 1.4k GitHub stars
SkillAEO Optimizermohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Optimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines. Produces an AEO-optimised rewrite with question headings, 50–80 word answer capsules, a paragraph-length audit, and flagged trust signals.★ 1.4k GitHub stars
SkillAI Ethics Review Conductormohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · by mohitagw15856Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.★ 1.4k GitHub stars