Azure Deployment Auditor

Azure App Onboard Prereq — Repository Evaluation

by microsoft · MIT license · ★ 3,077 on GitHub

Azure App Onboard Prereq — Repository Evaluation cover

Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility.

---
name: azure-app-onboard-prereq
description: "Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: \"evaluate my repo\", \"is my app ready to deploy\", \"what does my app need to deploy\", \"what do I need before deploying\", \"does my app need\", \"can I ship this to Azure\", \"scan my repo for issues\", \"is this app deployable\", \"check if my app is ready for Azure\", \"do I need a Dockerfile\", \"what's blocking my deployment\", \"are there any blockers\", \"are my dependencies compatible\", \"does Azure support my framework\", \"what needs to change before deploying\", \"check my app configuration\"."
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: Microsoft
  version: "1.2.3"
---

# Azure App Onboard Prereq — Repository Evaluation

Evaluate a user's repository for build health, app completeness, and Azure deployment feasibility — before infrastructure planning. Produces per-component verdicts (PASS/WARN/FAIL) consumed by downstream phases.

> **Orchestrator relationship:** Called by `azure-app-onboard` at Step 3, or standalone for code readiness checks. When called by orchestrator, return control to `azure-app-onboard` after writing artifacts — do NOT invoke downstream phases directly.

Phase 1 of 4 in AppOnboard pipeline. Session: `.copilot-azure/sessions/{session-id}/`. Reads `context.json`. Writes `components[]`, `repo{}`, `detectedInfra[]`. Produces `prereq-output.json`. Schema: [`prereq-schemas.ts`](references/prereq-schemas.ts) — `PrereqOutput`, `BuildRequirements`. Direct entry supported.

## When NOT to Use

Overview

Evaluate a user's repository for build health, app completeness, and Azure deployment feasibility — before infrastructure planning. Produces per-component verdicts (PASS/WARN/FAIL) consumed by downstream phases.

Manual install (npx, ZIP)
Claude Codenpx skills add microsoft/skills --skill azure-app-onboard-prereq -g -a claude-code
Claude Code (degit)npx degit microsoft/skills/.github/plugins/azure-skills/skills/azure-app-onboard-prereq#main ~/.claude/skills/azure-app-onboard-prereq
Claude.ai / desktopZip the folder and upload it under Settings → Capabilities → Skills.
Codex, Cursor, other agentsPoint them at SKILL.md. The other files are plain text.

Connects with Agent Alley MCP · agentalley.io/mcp

Files included

  • SKILL.md10.0 KB
Read SKILL.md here
microsoft/main1 file shown
SKILL.md
Show the full text120 lines

Azure App Onboard Prereq — Repository Evaluation

Evaluate a user's repository for build health, app completeness, and Azure deployment feasibility — before infrastructure planning. Produces per-component verdicts (PASS/WARN/FAIL) consumed by downstream phases.

Orchestrator relationship: Called by azure-app-onboard at Step 3, or standalone for code readiness checks. When called by orchestrator, return control to azure-app-onboard after writing artifacts — do NOT invoke downstream phases directly.

Phase 1 of 4 in AppOnboard pipeline. Session: .copilot-azure/sessions/{session-id}/. Reads context.json. Writes components[], repo{}, detectedInfra[]. Produces prereq-output.json. Schema: prereq-schemas.ts — PrereqOutput, BuildRequirements. Direct entry supported.

When NOT to Use

Signal Redirect
Validate infrastructure (Bicep/TF/azure.yaml) azure-validate
Generate IaC azure-prepare
End-to-end idea-to-production azure-app-onboard
Run azd up or deploy azure-deploy

Rules

⛔ ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION — npm install, npm test, npx jest, pytest, and ALL install/build/test commands are NEVER allowed. Under NO circumstances may you run npm install, npm test, npx jest, pip install, pytest, dotnet build, dotnet restore, dotnet test, go mod download, cargo build, or ANY package-manager install, build, or test command during the prereq phase. Do NOT run test suites to verify code — check for test config files statically instead. The prereq phase is read-only evaluation + static-only verification. ONLY exception — two sanctioned contexts, both consent-gated: (a) code the agent modified during migration/remediation (see remediation-protocol.md step 6), or (b) code the agent wrote from scratch on the zero-code path (see zero-code-path.md). In either case, install/build/test runs ONLY via the user-confirmed build-validation gate (build-check.md Step 3), after the user answers that specific per-command consent prompt. General prior consent never counts.

  1. ⛔ Full pipeline (Steps 1–8), no exceptions. All prompts → Step 1 directly. Answer specific questions AS PART OF findings (Step 5), not before.
  2. ⛔ No sub-agents for evaluation. 3-axis evaluation is inline. Exception: zero-code-path scaffolding (Step 2).
  3. Code/destructive modifications require ask_user. Max 3 questions before results. Direct entry: don't repeat orchestrator's intent questions.

MCP Tools

Tool Purpose
mcp_azure_mcp_get_azure_bestpractices Validate detected stack patterns against Azure best practices
mcp_azure_mcp_extension_cli_install Check/install required CLI tools (az, azd, func)

Workflow

Step 1: Session Check

Orchestrator entry: Session exists — read context.json, proceed to Step 2.

Direct entry: Check .copilot-azure/sessions/active-session.json:

  • Exists → ⛔ read session-protocol.md for resume/fresh gate. Do NOT proceed until user answers.
  • Missing → create session: generate UUID, New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path ".copilot-azure/sessions/{uuid}" -Force, write context.json + active-session.json via create tool.

Then: az account show → merge {id, name, tenantId} into context.json.azure. ⛔ Session MUST exist on disk before any scanning.

Step 2: Scan Workspace

Scan for project files. Detect components, repo{}, detectedInfra[], detectedServices[]. Classify Terraform providers. Check CLI availability. Stack detection conflicts: user explicit statement wins (write to context.json, mark scan as override); scan-only → confirm with user; multiple stacks → show all and ask (see component-mapping.md); no code → zero-code-path.md.

If no project files, no Dockerfile, AND no index.html → ⛔ read zero-code-path.md.

⛔ Cloud SDK early gate. Grep for aws-sdk|@aws-sdk|boto3|google-cloud|@google-cloud|firebase. If functional deps found → read cloud-sdk-migration.md, then ask_user: "Redirect to Azure Cloud Migrate" (set routeToSkill: "azure-cloud-migrate") · "Continue evaluation anyway" (finish readiness eval + SDK→Azure mapping, then STOP at Step 8 — no plan until the deps are swapped) · "Cancel".

Step 3: Per-Component Evaluation
Sub-step Action Reference
3.1 Build check ⛔ You MUST read build-check.md
3.2 Completeness check ⛔ You MUST read completeness-check.md
3.3 Deployability check ⛔ You MUST read deployability-check.md
3.3a Component mapping (conditional) Read component-mapping.md ONLY IF >1 project manifest found (monorepo)

Populate buildRequirements per component after evaluation. Verdict propagation, tier rules, and f1Viable aggregation are in readiness-gate.md and the individual check references.

Step 4: Write Artifacts + Readiness Gate

⛔ Verify context.json exists on disk. Read readiness-gate.md (verdicts, tiers, batch-then-approve, fast-track) then prereq-artifacts.md (write procedures, schemas).

Step 5: Present Findings

Per readiness-gate.md § Present Findings — show verdicts grouped by severity before proceeding.

Step 6: Remediation (conditional)

⛔ You MUST read remediation-protocol.md IF any ❌ FAIL verdict, 🔧 Recommended Fix, or ⚠️ WARN with fixPhase: "prereq" exists. Contains remediation loop, static verification, re-eval mandate, post-remediation artifact updates, and the build-validation consent gate. If all verdicts are ✅ PASS or ⚠️ WARN without fixPhase: "prereq", skip to Step 7.

Step 7: Write Final State

completedPhases already has "prereq" + currentPhase: null (from Step 4). Then:

⛔ Write lastScanCommit. Run git rev-parse HEAD and store the full 40-character SHA as context.json.repo.lastScanCommit. Required — staleness guard in Step 1 compares to HEAD on resume to detect changes.

Step 8: Route

⛔ Mandatory — do NOT skip this step.

Routing fields: All routing writes routeToSkill and routeReason to context.json.

Post-remediation context: If Step 6 ran, lead the routing prompt with: "Remediation complete — {N} issues fixed, your app is now {overallHealth}."

⛔ Evaluate rows top to bottom — first match wins.

# Condition Action
1 routeToSkill set (any entry) ask_user: "Redirect to {routeToSkill}" / "Not now". ⛔ Pipeline stops — do NOT proceed to architecture planning.
2 cloudSdkFindings[] non-empty (user chose "Continue evaluation anyway") Present the cloud-SDK → Azure swap mapping as 🔶 blockers, then ask_user with this exact prompt: "🔶 Cloud SDK migration required — these dependencies must be swapped before this app can deploy to Azure. (Redirect to azure-cloud-migrate / Stop — swap manually and re-run)" — Redirect sets routeToSkill: "azure-cloud-migrate", Stop halts. ⛔ Pipeline stops — do NOT proceed to architecture planning, and do NOT offer a "continue to prepare" option; the app can't deploy until the deps are swapped.
3 Orchestrator + no routeToSkill Tell the user: "✅ Your app has been evaluated and is ready — let's plan your Azure deployment." Then invoke azure-app-onboard. ⛔ Do NOT stop, do NOT wait for user input, do NOT narrate internal handoffs. The user already consented to the full pipeline at scope triage.
4 Direct + ready/readyWithCaveats + no Azure infra ask_user: "Deploy to Azure (full pipeline)" → invoke azure-app-onboard / "Not now"
5 Direct + ready/readyWithCaveats + existing Azure infra ask_user: "Start fresh" → invoke azure-app-onboard / "Use existing infra" → invoke azure-prepare / "Not now"
6 Direct + blocked Report blocker summary + "Fix and re-run."

Severity tiers (🛑🔶❌🔧⚠️✅) are defined in readiness-gate.md.

Outputs

Artifact Location Consumer
Session context context.json → components[], repo{}, detectedInfra[], detectedServices[] All downstream phases
Prereq output prereq-output.json prepare phase (via azure-app-onboard)
Readiness report .copilot-azure/sessions/{uuid}/readiness-report.md User (offline reference)
1---
2name: azure-app-onboard-prereq
3description: "Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: \"evaluate my repo\", \"is my app ready to deploy\", \"what does my app need to deploy\", \"what do I need before deploying\", \"does my app need\", \"can I ship this to Azure\", \"scan my repo for issues\", \"is this app deployable\", \"check if my app is ready for Azure\", \"do I need a Dockerfile\", \"what's blocking my deployment\", \"are there any blockers\", \"are my dependencies compatible\", \"does Azure support my framework\", \"what needs to change before deploying\", \"check my app configuration\"."
4license: MIT
5metadata:
6 author: Microsoft
7 version: "1.2.3"
8---
9 
10# Azure App Onboard Prereq — Repository Evaluation
11 
12Evaluate a user's repository for build health, app completeness, and Azure deployment feasibility — before infrastructure planning. Produces per-component verdicts (PASS/WARN/FAIL) consumed by downstream phases.
13 
14> **Orchestrator relationship:** Called by `azure-app-onboard` at Step 3, or standalone for code readiness checks. When called by orchestrator, return control to `azure-app-onboard` after writing artifacts — do NOT invoke downstream phases directly.
15 
16Phase 1 of 4 in AppOnboard pipeline. Session: `.copilot-azure/sessions/{session-id}/`. Reads `context.json`. Writes `components[]`, `repo{}`, `detectedInfra[]`. Produces `prereq-output.json`. Schema: [`prereq-schemas.ts`](references/prereq-schemas.ts) — `PrereqOutput`, `BuildRequirements`. Direct entry supported.
17 
18## When NOT to Use
19 
20| Signal | Redirect |
21|--------|----------|
22| Validate infrastructure (Bicep/TF/azure.yaml) | **azure-validate** |
23| Generate IaC | **azure-prepare** |
24| End-to-end idea-to-production | **azure-app-onboard** |
25| Run `azd up` or deploy | **azure-deploy** |
26 
27## Rules
28 
29> ⛔ **ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION — `npm install`, `npm test`, `npx jest`, `pytest`, and ALL install/build/test commands are NEVER allowed.**
30> Under NO circumstances may you run `npm install`, `npm test`, `npx jest`, `pip install`, `pytest`, `dotnet build`, `dotnet restore`, `dotnet test`, `go mod download`, `cargo build`, or ANY package-manager install, build, or test command during the prereq phase. Do NOT run test suites to verify code — check for test config files statically instead. The prereq phase is read-only evaluation + static-only verification.
31> **ONLY exception — two sanctioned contexts, both consent-gated:** (a) code the agent **modified** during migration/remediation (see [remediation-protocol.md](references/remediation-protocol.md) step 6), or (b) code the agent **wrote** from scratch on the zero-code path (see [zero-code-path.md](references/zero-code-path.md)). In either case, install/build/test runs ONLY via the user-confirmed build-validation gate ([build-check.md](references/build-check.md) Step 3), after the user answers that specific per-command consent prompt. General prior consent never counts.
32 
331. ⛔ **Full pipeline (Steps 1–8), no exceptions.** All prompts → Step 1 directly. Answer specific questions AS PART OF findings (Step 5), not before.
342. ⛔ **No sub-agents for evaluation.** 3-axis evaluation is inline. **Exception**: zero-code-path scaffolding (Step 2).
353. Code/destructive modifications require `ask_user`. Max 3 questions before results. Direct entry: don't repeat orchestrator's intent questions.
36 
37## MCP Tools
38 
39| Tool | Purpose |
40|------|---------|
41| `mcp_azure_mcp_get_azure_bestpractices` | Validate detected stack patterns against Azure best practices |
42| `mcp_azure_mcp_extension_cli_install` | Check/install required CLI tools (az, azd, func) |
43 
44## Workflow
45 
46### Step 1: Session Check
47 
48**Orchestrator entry:** Session exists — read `context.json`, proceed to Step 2.
49 
50**Direct entry:** Check `.copilot-azure/sessions/active-session.json`:
51- **Exists** → ⛔ read [session-protocol.md](references/session-protocol.md) for resume/fresh gate. Do NOT proceed until user answers.
52- **Missing** → create session: generate UUID, `New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path ".copilot-azure/sessions/{uuid}" -Force`, write `context.json` + `active-session.json` via `create` tool.
53 
54Then: `az account show` → merge `{id, name, tenantId}` into `context.json.azure`. ⛔ Session MUST exist on disk before any scanning.
55 
56### Step 2: Scan Workspace
57 
58Scan for project files. Detect components, `repo{}`, `detectedInfra[]`, `detectedServices[]`. Classify Terraform providers. Check CLI availability. Stack detection conflicts: user explicit statement wins (write to `context.json`, mark scan as override); scan-only → confirm with user; multiple stacks → show all and ask (see [component-mapping.md](references/component-mapping.md)); no code → [zero-code-path.md](references/zero-code-path.md).
59 
60> If no project files, no Dockerfile, AND no index.html → ⛔ read [zero-code-path.md](references/zero-code-path.md).
61 
62> ⛔ **Cloud SDK early gate.** Grep for `aws-sdk|@aws-sdk|boto3|google-cloud|@google-cloud|firebase`. If functional deps found → read [cloud-sdk-migration.md](references/cloud-sdk-migration.md), then `ask_user`: **"Redirect to Azure Cloud Migrate"** (set `routeToSkill: "azure-cloud-migrate"`) · **"Continue evaluation anyway"** (finish readiness eval + SDK→Azure mapping, then STOP at Step 8 — no plan until the deps are swapped) · **"Cancel"**.
63 
64### Step 3: Per-Component Evaluation
65 
66| Sub-step | Action | Reference |
67|----------|--------|-----------|
68| 3.1 | **Build check** | ⛔ **You MUST read [build-check.md](references/build-check.md)** |
69| 3.2 | **Completeness check** | ⛔ **You MUST read [completeness-check.md](references/completeness-check.md)** |
70| 3.3 | **Deployability check** | ⛔ **You MUST read [deployability-check.md](references/deployability-check.md)** |
71| 3.3a | **Component mapping** (conditional) | Read [component-mapping.md](references/component-mapping.md) ONLY IF >1 project manifest found (monorepo) |
72 
73Populate `buildRequirements` per component after evaluation. Verdict propagation, tier rules, and f1Viable aggregation are in [readiness-gate.md](references/readiness-gate.md) and the individual check references.
74 
75### Step 4: Write Artifacts + Readiness Gate
76 
77⛔ Verify `context.json` exists on disk. Read [readiness-gate.md](references/readiness-gate.md) (verdicts, tiers, batch-then-approve, fast-track) then [prereq-artifacts.md](references/prereq-artifacts.md) (write procedures, schemas).
78 
79### Step 5: Present Findings
80 
81Per [readiness-gate.md § Present Findings](references/readiness-gate.md) — show verdicts grouped by severity before proceeding.
82 
83### Step 6: Remediation (conditional)
84 
85⛔ **You MUST read [remediation-protocol.md](references/remediation-protocol.md)** IF any ❌ FAIL verdict, 🔧 Recommended Fix, or ⚠️ WARN with `fixPhase: "prereq"` exists. Contains remediation loop, static verification, re-eval mandate, post-remediation artifact updates, and the build-validation consent gate. If all verdicts are ✅ PASS or ⚠️ WARN without `fixPhase: "prereq"`, skip to Step 7.
86 
87### Step 7: Write Final State
88 
89`completedPhases` already has `"prereq"` + `currentPhase: null` (from Step 4). Then:
90 
91> ⛔ **Write `lastScanCommit`.** Run `git rev-parse HEAD` and store the full 40-character SHA as `context.json.repo.lastScanCommit`. Required — staleness guard in Step 1 compares to HEAD on resume to detect changes.
92 
93### Step 8: Route
94 
95⛔ **Mandatory — do NOT skip this step.**
96 
97> **Routing fields:** All routing writes `routeToSkill` and `routeReason` to `context.json`.
98 
99> **Post-remediation context:** If Step 6 ran, lead the routing prompt with: "Remediation complete — {N} issues fixed, your app is now {overallHealth}."
100 
101> ⛔ **Evaluate rows top to bottom — first match wins.**
102 
103| # | Condition | Action |
104|---|-----------|--------|
105| 1 | `routeToSkill` set (any entry) | `ask_user`: "Redirect to {routeToSkill}" / "Not now". ⛔ Pipeline stops — do NOT proceed to architecture planning. |
106| 2 | `cloudSdkFindings[]` non-empty (user chose "Continue evaluation anyway") | Present the cloud-SDK → Azure swap mapping as 🔶 blockers, then `ask_user` with this exact prompt: **"🔶 Cloud SDK migration required — these dependencies must be swapped before this app can deploy to Azure. (Redirect to azure-cloud-migrate / Stop — swap manually and re-run)"** — Redirect sets `routeToSkill: "azure-cloud-migrate"`, Stop halts. ⛔ Pipeline stops — do NOT proceed to architecture planning, and do NOT offer a "continue to prepare" option; the app can't deploy until the deps are swapped. |
107| 3 | Orchestrator + no `routeToSkill` | Tell the user: "✅ Your app has been evaluated and is ready — let's plan your Azure deployment." Then invoke `azure-app-onboard`. ⛔ Do NOT stop, do NOT wait for user input, do NOT narrate internal handoffs. The user already consented to the full pipeline at scope triage. |
108| 4 | Direct + ready/readyWithCaveats + no Azure infra | `ask_user`: "Deploy to Azure (full pipeline)" → invoke `azure-app-onboard` / "Not now" |
109| 5 | Direct + ready/readyWithCaveats + existing Azure infra | `ask_user`: "Start fresh" → invoke `azure-app-onboard` / "Use existing infra" → invoke `azure-prepare` / "Not now" |
110| 6 | Direct + blocked | Report blocker summary + "Fix and re-run." |
111 
112Severity tiers (🛑🔶❌🔧⚠️✅) are defined in [readiness-gate.md](references/readiness-gate.md).
113 
114## Outputs
115 
116| Artifact | Location | Consumer |
117|----------|----------|----------|
118| Session context | `context.json` → `components[]`, `repo{}`, `detectedInfra[]`, `detectedServices[]` | All downstream phases |
119| Prereq output | `prereq-output.json` | prepare phase (via `azure-app-onboard`) |
120| Readiness report | `.copilot-azure/sessions/{uuid}/readiness-report.md` | User (offline reference) |
View all files on GitHub →

Details

License
MIT
Stars on the repo
★ 3,077
Checked
Source
microsoft/skills ↗
Creator
microsoft · 31 listings
View creator

Similar skills

See all →
SkillAzure App Deployermicrosoft/skills · by microsoftEnd-to-end orchestrator: from a business idea, app idea, or existing app to running Azure deployment with cost estimates and pre-deploy approval. Analyzes your app, auto-detects the right Azure services, scaffolds infrastructure code, and deploys — tailored to your app, not a template. Handles moving existing apps to Azure without rewriting or with minimal changes. WHEN: bring your app to Azure, plan my app, cost to run, is my code ready to deploy, deploy my app to the cloud, deploy all my services, what Azure services do I need, plan my Azure deployment, deploy my new app to Azure, one-click deploy, I have an app and want it on Azure, migrate my app to Azure, help me get started, build an app, no code yet, starter project. DO NOT USE FOR: use azd for deployment(use azure-deploy), optimizing existing costs (use cost-optimization), code readiness checks only (use azure-app-onboard-prereq).★ 3.1k GitHub starsSkillAzure AI Gatewaymicrosoft/azure-skills · by microsoftConfigure Azure API Management as an AI Gateway for AI models, MCP tools, and agents. WHEN: semantic caching, token limit, content safety, load balancing, AI model governance, MCP rate limiting, jailbreak detection, add Azure OpenAI backend, add AI Foundry model, test AI gateway, LLM policies, configure AI backend, token metrics, AI cost control, convert API to MCP, import OpenAPI to gateway.★ 1.6k GitHub starsSkillKusto Query Buildermicrosoft/azure-skills · by microsoftQuery and analyze data in Azure Data Explorer (Kusto/ADX) using KQL for log analytics, telemetry, and time series analysis. WHEN: KQL queries, Kusto database queries, Azure Data Explorer, ADX clusters, log analytics, time series data, IoT telemetry, anomaly detection.★ 1.6k GitHub starsAgentDocker CLI Container Gatewaydocker/mcp-gateway · by dockerDocker's own CLI plugin: run any server from the Docker MCP Catalog in its own container, behind one connection, with secrets kept out of env vars.★ 1.6k GitHub starsAgentAgent Marketplaceelisymlabs/elisym · by elisymlabsOpen infrastructure for AI agents to discover and pay each other★ 17 GitHub starsSkillNextflow Pipeline BuilderK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · by K-Dense-AIBuild, run, and debug Nextflow data pipelines and nf-core workflows end to end. Use whenever the user mentions Nextflow, nf-core, .nf files, nextflow.config, DSL2, processes/channels/operators, samplesheets, or wants to run a community pipeline (e.g. nf-core/rnaseq, nf-core/sarek), write or test a module/subworkflow with nf-test, configure executors/containers (Docker, Singularity/Apptainer, Conda, Wave), scale a workflow to HPC/SLURM or cloud (AWS Batch, Google Batch, Azure, Kubernetes), or debug a failed/-resume run. Make sure to use this skill for any reproducible scientific/bioinformatics workflow work even if the user does not say the word "Nextflow", and for authoring nf-core-compliant pipelines, modules, configs, and linting.★ 46k GitHub stars

More from microsoft

AgentPlaywright Browser Automation MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp · by microsoftMicrosoft's browser automation server: your AI opens pages, clicks, fills forms and reads the page through the accessibility tree.★ 37.5k GitHub starsSkillUsage-Based Agent Trainermicrosoft/SkillOpt · by microsoftUse when the user wants their Claude agent to self-improve from past usage, asks about a nightly/offline 'sleep' or 'dream' cycle, memory/skill consolidation, or says things like 'make my agent better the more I use it', 'review my past sessions', 'learn my pr★ 17.3k GitHub starsSkillAzure App Deployermicrosoft/skills · by microsoftEnd-to-end orchestrator: from a business idea, app idea, or existing app to running Azure deployment with cost estimates and pre-deploy approval. Analyzes your app, auto-detects the right Azure services, scaffolds infrastructure code, and deploys — tailored to your app, not a template. Handles moving existing apps to Azure without rewriting or with minimal changes. WHEN: bring your app to Azure, plan my app, cost to run, is my code ready to deploy, deploy my app to the cloud, deploy all my services, what Azure services do I need, plan my Azure deployment, deploy my new app to Azure, one-click deploy, I have an app and want it on Azure, migrate my app to Azure, help me get started, build an app, no code yet, starter project. DO NOT USE FOR: use azd for deployment(use azure-deploy), optimizing existing costs (use cost-optimization), code readiness checks only (use azure-app-onboard-prereq).★ 3.1k GitHub starsSkillAzure Security Auditormicrosoft/skills · by microsoftRun Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.★ 3.1k GitHub starsSkillAzure AI Gatewaymicrosoft/azure-skills · by microsoftConfigure Azure API Management as an AI Gateway for AI models, MCP tools, and agents. WHEN: semantic caching, token limit, content safety, load balancing, AI model governance, MCP rate limiting, jailbreak detection, add Azure OpenAI backend, add AI Foundry model, test AI gateway, LLM policies, configure AI backend, token metrics, AI cost control, convert API to MCP, import OpenAPI to gateway.★ 1.6k GitHub starsSkillKusto Query Buildermicrosoft/azure-skills · by microsoftQuery and analyze data in Azure Data Explorer (Kusto/ADX) using KQL for log analytics, telemetry, and time series analysis. WHEN: KQL queries, Kusto database queries, Azure Data Explorer, ADX clusters, log analytics, time series data, IoT telemetry, anomaly detection.★ 1.6k GitHub stars